Intel Coffee Lake CPUs : Threadrippers Ripped ?
Intel finally decided to add more cores to their performance line-up of CPUs, perhaps a cautionary step since AMD has been providing CPUs with more cores at the same price. But, such a strategy carried on by Intel preferably pleased their respective audiences. But there's more to Intel's 8th gen CPUs than just core incrementation.
Overview
So what makes these new chips replace the previous Kaby Lake processors, which were not even a year old ? Well, the new 8th gen chips, not only provide 2 extra cores to each series, including the i3, but they are also based on the same yet slightly improved 14nm architecture, which Intel now calls, 14nm++. This means that the CPU sockets remain the same i.e. LGA 1151 sockets.
Unfortunately, that doesn't mean the 8th gen CPUs would readily be compatible with the previous gen motherboards, with LGA 1151 sockets, since backwards compatibility is not supported. A bios update is necessary to alllow the chips to run in the motherboards.
Another significant improvement includes that the chips will now support dual channel DDR4-2666 RAM versus the previous kaby lake chips which supported upto DDR4-2400 RAM.
These chips have almost the same power efficiency but provides better optimization to power utility. The processor speed has slightly been altered in order to provide a bit more efficient usage in order tp cope up with the power demand. The base clock speeds for each series have been lowered a bit, while boosting them provides a slightly higher bump to previous gen chips.
Specifications
Here is a detailed comparison of specification of each of the upcoming CPU series that has been recently released.
Essentials
|
||||||
Vertical Segment
|
Desktop
|
Desktop
|
Desktop
|
Desktop
|
Desktop
|
Desktop
|
Processor
Number
|
i3-8100
|
i3-8350K
|
i5-8400
|
i5-8600K
|
i7-8700K
|
i7-8700
|
Status |
Launched
|
Launched
|
Launched
|
Launched
|
Launched
|
Launched
|
Launch Date |
Q4'17
|
Q4'17
|
Q4'17
|
Q4'17
|
Q4'17
|
Q4'17
|
Lithography |
14 nm |
14 nm |
14 nm |
14 nm |
14 nm |
14 nm |
Recommended Customer Price |
$117.00
|
$168.00
- $179.00
|
$182.00
- $187.00
|
$257.00
- $258.00
|
$359.00
- $370.00
|
$303.00
- $312.00
|
Performance
|
||||||
# of
Cores
|
4
|
4
|
6
|
6
|
6
|
6
|
# of Threads |
4 |
4 |
6 |
6 |
12 |
12 |
Processor Base Frequency |
3.60
GHz
|
4.00
GHz
|
2.80
GHz
|
3.60
GHz
|
3.70
GHz
|
3.20
GHz
|
Cache |
6 MB |
8 MB |
9 MB |
9 MB |
12 MB |
12 MB |
Bus Speed |
8 GT/s DMI3 |
8 GT/s DMI3 |
8 GT/s DMI3 |
8 GT/s DMI3 |
8 GT/s DMI3 |
8 GT/s DMI3 |
TDP |
65 W
|
91 W
|
65 W
|
95 W
|
95 W
|
65 W
|
Max Turbo Frequency |
4.00
GHz
|
4.30
GHz
|
4.70
GHz
|
4.60
GHz
|
||
Memory Specifications
|
||||||
Max
Memory Size (dependent on memory type)
|
64 GB
|
64 GB
|
64 GB
|
64 GB
|
64 GB
|
64 GB
|
Memory Types |
DDR4-2400
|
DDR4-2400
|
DDR4-2666
|
DDR4-2666
|
DDR4-2666
|
DDR4-2666
|
Max # of Memory Channels |
2
|
2
|
2
|
2
|
2
|
2
|
ECC Memory Supported ‡ |
No
|
No
|
No
|
No
|
No
|
No
|
Graphics Specifications
|
||||||
Processor
Graphics ‡
|
Intel®
UHD Graphics 630
|
Intel®
UHD Graphics 630
|
Intel®
UHD Graphics 630
|
Intel®
UHD Graphics 630
|
Intel®
UHD Graphics 630
|
Intel®
UHD Graphics 630
|
Graphics Base Frequency |
350 MHz
|
350 MHz
|
350 MHz
|
350 MHz
|
350 MHz
|
350 MHz
|
Graphics Max Dynamic Frequency |
1.10
GHz
|
1.15
GHz
|
1.05
GHz
|
1.15
GHz
|
1.20
GHz
|
1.20
GHz
|
Graphics
Video Max Memory |
64 GB
|
64 GB
|
64 GB
|
64 GB
|
64 GB
|
64 GB
|
Execution Units |
23
|
23
|
23
|
24
|
24
|
24
|
4K Support |
Yes, at
60Hz
|
Yes, at
60Hz
|
Yes, at
60Hz
|
Yes, at
60Hz
|
Yes, at
60Hz
|
Yes, at
60Hz
|
Max Resolution (HDMI 1.4) |
4096x2304@24Hz
|
4096x2304@24Hz
|
4096x2304@24Hz
|
4096x2304@24Hz
|
4096x2304@24Hz
|
4096x2304@24Hz
|
Conclusion
With the chips already being launched in the market via online shopping sites, it's just a matter of time, before we see how Intel's attempt to out-shadow AMD's Ryzen. This move by Intel, although seemingly hefty, will definitely prove necessary for Intel's stability in the market. But, for the gaming enthusiasts, Intel was the one who taught us that gaming doesn't necessary require multiple cores, and hence have remained a steady choice for multiple gamers around the world.
However, one must really appreciate Intel's code naming skills, as the company always comes up with a quirky code name indeed.
Thanks for reading. Stay tuned for more from AskUsJunkies
Keep reading :
No comments: